- Mark Ivcevich
Why is Past Performance Definitely Not Indicative of Future Results?
Updated: Feb 15, 2021
Recency bias is a tricky thing. We remember our experiences that have just occurred and when it comes to investing we think, “man, I should have seen that coming and invested that way”. Back in the late 90’s, I recall being told that nobody needed a financial advisor anymore because anyone could pick just about any tech stock and do fine. With the advent of online low cost trading, it seemed so simple. Unfortunately market share wasn’t the only thing that mattered and eventually companies really did need to make money. Stocks tumbled for three years and suddenly the “lost decade” was on for US equity investors.
Now we are in a world with NO cost trading, fractional shares, and roaring large cap stocks. If only Emmett Brown were around with his Delorean we could all go back and be rich! The problem with this is as companies grow, it can be difficult to replicate the returns that made them such popular stocks in the past. To understand why past performance is not indicate of future results, just look at the performance of companies prior to becoming a top ten stock.
Recent Posts
See AllAmericans can file for Social Security from age 62 to age 70. The normal retirement age for Social Security depends on when you were born, but for those born from 1960 on, that age is 67. The longer
According to one major recordkeeper survey of their clients, they found the following trends as the leading changes ending in 2022 (in order of most changes): 1) Increased the matching contribution am